Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?
Shop deviantART for the
holidays and save BIG!
Click here! :holly:
[x]

deviantART

 

Nott'm lights Pano by *mahgnitton:iconmahgnitton:

Categories Photography > Animals, Plants & Nature > Waterscapes

©2005-2009 *mahgnitton
:iconmahgnitton:

Artist's Comments

panorama version with three pilons

Comments


love 0 0 joy 0 0 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:icontakeonthefuture:
~takeonthefuture Sep 27, 2005, 9:24:44 AM
I love how the stars shine through the orange sky. How long of an exposure did you use? Great composition!!
:iconneo101:
~Neo101 Sep 27, 2005, 11:13:30 AM
Somewhere in my :+fav: list is a photograph that has the same colour scheme. (obviously the reason for being in my :+fav: list in the first place!)

:D

Time to give it a partner!
:+fav:

--
THEREISNOSPOON
jackintomymatrix
:iconmahgnitton:
*mahgnitton Sep 28, 2005, 7:42:43 AM
thanks for the comment, fav, watch it's appreiciated, the exposure was around 20 seconds at ISO 100 and F12 with my canon 50mm lens :thumbsup:

--
More photography and High quality extra large prints ( some 60" ) Digital Magpie
:iconmahgnitton:
*mahgnitton Sep 28, 2005, 8:00:33 AM
chears m8e :thumbsup:

--
More photography and High quality extra large prints ( some 60" ) Digital Magpie
:iconuhre:
~uhre Oct 8, 2005, 12:02:30 AM
yet another :+fav: it's really a nice work. Full of details. How did you get the colours?

--
I'm not a photographer, I just know what I like and what I don't.
:iconmahgnitton:
*mahgnitton Oct 11, 2005, 7:40:31 AM
chears man, the colours were Natural...ish... :-)

the actual colour is real as the street lights difused through the mist very well, even though they were quite bright I had to take the frames at around 15-20 seconds exposure so they came out bright enough, the only edit in PS was contrast to enhance the colour already there :thumbsup:

--
More photography and High quality extra large prints ( some 60" ) Digital Magpie
:iconuhre:
~uhre Oct 11, 2005, 10:33:02 AM
oh that's pretty good. I tried to shoot in .raw - it was very nice. I think I'll use that more often. When I might want to print a photo.

--
I'm not a photographer, I just know what I like and what I don't.
:iconmahgnitton:
*mahgnitton Oct 13, 2005, 8:16:47 AM
always back up your .raw files before editing them, I opened a few in PS and edited them, I then clicked on open to transfer it from the applet to PS for further tweeking and saved to jpg but the original .raw file was overwriten by the edit in the raw applet even though I didn't choose to overwrite it!!

Raw can be good but is very time consuming which puts me off, I prefer taking the photo's instead of spending too much time editing :-)

--
More photography and High quality extra large prints ( some 60" ) Digital Magpie
:iconuhre:
~uhre Oct 14, 2005, 10:37:58 PM
yes raw is not easy to work with. I edited a bit and saved the file as a .dng (digital negative). I opened it in PS and I tried to convert as a .jpg, but it couldn't. I could only save as .psd. Well I thought if I have the file as a .psd I can always convert. So I did closed the program and opened the .psd file. I couldn't save as a .jpg, only if I used the save for website function. I saved it as a .jpg file, but it was only on 96x96 dpi!!! (I wanted to make a print so I couldn't settle with that). Anyway I ended up opening the .raw file and starting all over and converting to .jpg.

--
I'm not a photographer, I just know what I like and what I don't.
Previous Page12Next Page

Details

September 27, 2005
235 KB
1000×363

Statistics

11
5 [who?]
75 (0 today)

Site Map

©2009 deviantART. All rights reserved
About Us | Contact Us | Site Tour | Help & FAQ Advertise | Services Etiquette | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Copyright Policy